Assess. Understand. Match. Plan.
Four stages. Each one produces something the next stage needs, and nothing is skipped to get to a ranked list faster.
The four stages
Stage 1
Assess
Your client completes a structured assessment across nine sections. Around 15–25 minutes, saved as they go.
Eighty-nine items mixing forced choice, rating scales, ranking, bipolar sliders, career history and open questions. Clients can stop and resume; progress is shown as a section count rather than a percentage, because a percentage on a variable-length instrument is a guess.
Stage 2
Understand
Interests, values, strengths, preferences, motivators, experience and constraints, scored and profiled.
Responses become construct scores across five domains. Normative and ipsative responses are accumulated separately then blended, so a client who rates everything highly still produces a profile with shape rather than a flat line.
Stage 3
Match
Career possibilities ranked by alignment, each carrying the reasoning that produced the score.
Eight weighted dimensions compared against structured career profiles. Skills shortfalls count against a match and surplus never does. Hard constraints cap a score rather than hiding the career, because the strong match a client cannot currently afford is often the most useful thing in the room.
Stage 4
Plan
Turn a direction into steps the client can start on, with training options and timeframes.
Transferable skills, gaps, qualifications, job titles worth searching, and 30-day, 90-day and 12-month actions. Drafted by the system, edited by the practitioner, then handed to the client.
How the score is weighted
These are the starting weights. An administrator can change them, and every stored result records the configuration it was scored under — so a report from March stays interpretable in December.
| Dimension | Weight |
|---|---|
| Interests | 20% |
| Values | 20% |
| Work style | 15% |
| Skills | 15% |
| Motivators | 10% |
| Experience and transferables | 10% |
| Aspirations | 5% |
| Constraints | 5% |
Try it on a real case
The fastest way to judge this is with a client you already know well.